Get the right advice before proceeding with a malicious prosecution case

Carvanna v State of New South Wales [2022] NSWSC 594 – interlocutory decision.

This recent case considers the State of NSW’s motion to strike out pleadings filed by an unrepresented litigant in a malicious prosecution claim. It is important that all people have open access to the courts, however, this right must be balanced against the risk of wasting the courts’ time; and potential costs orders against self-represented litigants. We would strongly encourage anyone claiming malicious prosecution to obtain legal advice prior to commencing proceedings. The threshold for establishing the element of malice is perilously high.

Read more: https://jade.io/article/916132

Recent Articles

Conrad Curry

When Can You Sue a Professional in NSW?

Professional Negligence
15 July 2026
Conrad Curry

Step-by-Step Litigation Guide for Clients in NSW

General
15 July 2026
Tom Hunter-Leahy

Podiatrist Deregistered After Repeatedly Breaching Practice Conditions

Professional Misconduct
10 July 2026