Get the right advice before proceeding with a malicious prosecution case

Carvanna v State of New South Wales [2022] NSWSC 594 – interlocutory decision.

This recent case considers the State of NSW’s motion to strike out pleadings filed by an unrepresented litigant in a malicious prosecution claim. It is important that all people have open access to the courts, however, this right must be balanced against the risk of wasting the courts’ time; and potential costs orders against self-represented litigants. We would strongly encourage anyone claiming malicious prosecution to obtain legal advice prior to commencing proceedings. The threshold for establishing the element of malice is perilously high.

Read more: https://jade.io/article/916132

Recent Articles

Tom Hunter-Leahy

Blacktown Police Assault Case Raises Serious Questions About Police Accountability

Malicious Prosecution, Professional Misconduct
5 June 2026
Gwendolyn Devoy

Pharmacy Medication Error Tragedy

Medical Negligence
5 June 2026
Charlotte Walters

Motor accident or public transport claim?

Motor Vehicle Claims
3 June 2026