A recent decision of the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) has shed light on troubling conduct by Sydney-based ENT and facial plastic surgeon, Dr Tobias Pincock. In Health Care Complaints Commission v Pincock [2023], the Tribunal found Dr Pincock guilty of professional misconduct following numerous breaches of strict medical conditions intended to protect patients.
Why am I just hearing about this?
On 2 June 2025, NCAT removed the previous pseudonym order which had, until that date, protected Dr Pincock’s identity.
What Went Wrong?
Dr Pincock had a history of substance use and mental health issues, which led to conditions being placed on his medical registration as early as 2019. These conditions were not punitive. They were put in place to ensure he could continue practising safely while receiving the support he needed—through addiction specialists, drug testing, and medical supervision. But Dr Pincock repeatedly failed to comply.
He:
- Missed drug tests or provided diluted urine samples.
- Failed to notify authorities of his medication use.
- Self-administered restricted drugs without proper prescriptions.
- Delayed or refused treatment by qualified addiction specialists.
Despite several suspensions and repeated warnings, Dr Pincock continued to breach the faith and trust placed in him by his patients, the public, and the Medical Council of NSW.
Why This Matters
The medical profession requires its members to hold themselves and each other to a high standard of integrity and responsibility. When doctors fail to follow the rules—especially those designed to protect the public from risk—it can have devastating consequences. These aren’t just administrative breaches. They go to the heart of patient safety and professional integrity.
As the Tribunal pointed out, the repeated nature of Dr Pincock’s behaviour showed that he posed “a risk to the health and safety of the public.” The breaches were not just about missed paperwork—they showed a pattern of avoidance and indifference with respect to strict conditions.
What Does This Mean for Patients?
If you’ve received medical care and feel that Dr Pincock may have been impaired or failed to meet or uphold professional standards, it’s important to know that you have rights.
You may be able to:
- Request a formal review of your treatment.
- Make a complaint to the Health Care Complaints Commission.
- Seek compensation by way of a medical negligence claim.
Our team at The Law Office of Conrad Curry specialises in medical negligence cases. We know all too well the distress, shock, and betrayal patients feel when a healthcare provider lets them down. We’re here to help you make sense of what happened and guide you through your legal options.
Moving Forward
The case against Dr Pincock serves as a reminder of the importance of regulation and accountability in healthcare. When the system works, unsafe practices are identified, and patients are protected. But for those already affected, legal guidance can be the next step toward resolution and recovery.
DISCLAIMER
This article reflects the current law at the time of publication. Dr Pincock may avail himself of appeal rights which result in a need to amend or remove this article. It is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The actual decisions in each case are summarised for general understanding. For specific legal guidance in relation to your situation, please consult with a qualified legal professional.
